tempestuously (
tempestuously) wrote2010-03-17 06:06 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Ghostbuster + Redneck
My Irish contribution. It has the Pogues ooooh.
Also, I am with those who are a bit worn on the LJ bitching. I don't think half of the things LJ does wrong are done with malice so much as, for lack of better word, ignorance. As in ignorant to the big picture impact. It's a business after all. As I've said before, I only desire one thing from LJ and one thing alone. FOR THEM TO GIVE ME MY COMMENT NOTIFS WITHIN TEN MINUTES OF RECEIVING A TAG. This is not an insane requirement. :\
In book news, I really want more about Levitas. I will feel majorly cheated if his story is unresolved. I want to give the little dragon a hug. That and I think Roland is a cursed name. And for heaven's sake, Novik, pick ONE name for characters and stick with. I get that people have first and last names and that CHARACTERS might refer to them as either, but as your book is in third-person, YOU should stick with one. I have no idea who anyone is in this book half the time. ONE NAME.
I dislike the hate sent toward the RPer who admitted she didn't use the HMD meme because she didn't care what anyone else thought. Yeah, part of it had to do with the snarky wording, but the rest... I didn't see where every player should have to subject themselves to a critique or that they are a lesser person for not doing so. Sure, it might hurt to know that your BURNING OPINION is considered meaningless to someone who just wants to have fun, but hey that's life. Join the Redskins fans.
I just like violence. And I'm still undecided on how I feel about the episode overall.

And yay, my Irish brown bread making was a success! Now to send it.
Also, I am with those who are a bit worn on the LJ bitching. I don't think half of the things LJ does wrong are done with malice so much as, for lack of better word, ignorance. As in ignorant to the big picture impact. It's a business after all. As I've said before, I only desire one thing from LJ and one thing alone. FOR THEM TO GIVE ME MY COMMENT NOTIFS WITHIN TEN MINUTES OF RECEIVING A TAG. This is not an insane requirement. :\
In book news, I really want more about Levitas. I will feel majorly cheated if his story is unresolved. I want to give the little dragon a hug. That and I think Roland is a cursed name. And for heaven's sake, Novik, pick ONE name for characters and stick with. I get that people have first and last names and that CHARACTERS might refer to them as either, but as your book is in third-person, YOU should stick with one. I have no idea who anyone is in this book half the time. ONE NAME.
I dislike the hate sent toward the RPer who admitted she didn't use the HMD meme because she didn't care what anyone else thought. Yeah, part of it had to do with the snarky wording, but the rest... I didn't see where every player should have to subject themselves to a critique or that they are a lesser person for not doing so. Sure, it might hurt to know that your BURNING OPINION is considered meaningless to someone who just wants to have fun, but hey that's life. Join the Redskins fans.
I just like violence. And I'm still undecided on how I feel about the episode overall.

And yay, my Irish brown bread making was a success! Now to send it.
no subject
ಠ_ಠ
REALLY, NOW?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ALSO STOP USING ASTERISKS FOR ACTION TAGS
ALSO FIX YOUR JOURNAL NAME THAT IS NOT THE OFFICIAL SPELLING
no subject
no subject
Also, lol re: HMD meme thingy. It reminds me of this online article I read about the fan reaction (specifically, the sense of fan entitlement) toward... I think it was to Chuck. Thoughtful critiques and the like can be helpful for keeping both a creator (or, in this case, RPer) and the watchers/readers/etc. on the ball, but in the end? THAT PERSON WHO IS ACTUALLY THE CREATOR/RPer/WHATEVER IS THE PERSON WHOSE OPINION MATTERS. And particularly for RP, it's not like we're trying to change the world or shape popular culture here. Reading the comments here, it seems like it was the sort of thing that was just asking for a strong reaction, but the idea that a person should subject themselves and their leisure activity to the judgment of strangers in order to be valid is a pet peeve of mine. Sure, some people suck! I suck at baseball. But that doesn't mean I should be shamed out of playing catch on the weekends. (Just that I'm delusional if I think that I should have been on an Olympic softball team.)
. . . .
[/pet peeve]
no subject
And yeah it wasn't worded civilly at all, but the amount of "but just because they don't play with you doesn't mean their opinion is invalid" rubbed me the wrong way. Aside from their snarkiness, the person pretty much said if she doesn't play with a person, she doesn't care what they think about her RPing. And I... honestly don't see why this is a bad thing. How does it affect the people she doesn't play with? 0_o
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject